Craig Wright est-il réellement l'inventeur du Bitcoin, Satoshi Nakamoto ?  C'est ce tribunal qui décide.

A court will decide on the true identity of the inventor of Bitcoin, is Craig Wright Satoshi Nakamoto?

In the tumultuous arena of cryptocurrency, a legal saga with immense stakes is attracting worldwide attention: the controversy surrounding the real identity of the legendary Satoshi Nakamoto, the enigmatic figure at the origin of Bitcoin. At the heart of this dispute, Craig Wright, an Australian computer scientist, has claimed for years to be the mind behind this pseudonym. However, his assertions are far from unanimous.

The debate took a decisive turn when the **Crypto Open Patent Alliance (COPA)**, a grouping of major players in the world of cryptocurrency working for an environment free from the obstacles of patents, brought the matter before the Haute United Kingdom Court of Justice. The stakes in this legal battle go far beyond the question of the authorship of the Bitcoin white paper: they go to the very heart of the future of cryptocurrency and its free use.

Since the publication of a mysterious white paper in 2008 under the pseudonym Satoshi Nakamoto, the identity of this author has remained one of the greatest mysteries of the digital age. Wright caused a surprise in 2016 by claiming to be the latter, although these claims were quickly met with a wall of skepticism due to a lack of convincing evidence.

COPA did not hesitate to counterattack, arguing that Wright was never able to provide compelling evidence to support his claims. Worse still, the alliance accuses Wright of falsifying documents to support his allegations. Among the controversial elements, critics point to Wright’s alleged use of LaTeX typesetting software in writing the white paper, while experts agree that OpenOffice was instead used.

A lire également  Space and Time proposes to improve data transparency in the world of AI thanks to Web3

At the start of the trial, COPA lawyers did not mince their words, denouncing a “lie based on a false narrative” on the part of Wright. For its part, Wright’s defense presented what it called “clear evidence” of his legitimacy as the creator of Bitcoin, in an attempt to sweep away doubts.

However, history seems far from leaning in Wright’s favor, having faced several legal setbacks in the past. One court even imposed a symbolic penalty of £1 in damages on Wright, considering that he had presented a “deliberately false dossier”.

The court will therefore have to navigate an ocean of evidence and counter-evidence to try to untangle this Gordian knot. Even if the recognition of Wright as a real Satoshi by the courts would not completely erase the doubts, a contrary decision could potentially put an end to his claims.

The High Court’s decision could therefore have a resounding impact not only on the future of Bitcoin technology but also on the overall perception of reliability and transparency in the cryptocurrency sector. **Did Craig Wright invent Bitcoin?** Only the court verdict can now provide an answer to this thorny question.